U.S. Supreme Court Strikes Down Trump's Birthright Citizenship Executive Order in 6-3 Ruling
0xBroomberg
The US Supreme Court ruled 6-3 to overturn Trump's executive order restricting birthright citizenship, finding it conflicts with the Fourteenth Amendment — the second time in months the court has blocked a core Trump policy, deepening tensions between the presidency and the judiciary.
What did the Supreme Court strike down?
Trump signed the executive order on his first day in office, aiming to deny automatic citizenship to children born to non-citizen, non-permanent-resident parents.
The Fourteenth Amendment — ratified after the Civil War — states that "all persons born or naturalized in the United States" are citizens. The order ran directly against that text.
This means → the president tried to override a constitutional right by executive action, and the court ruled he overstepped.
What does the 6-3 vote tell us?
A 6-3 margin means not just liberal justices opposed the order — some conservatives did too.
In plain terms = Trump personally appointed three of the nine justices, yet even his own nominees did not all side with him.
This reflects how deeply embedded birthright citizenship is in American constitutional law — even ideologically conservative judges would not touch it.
What else did the court decide that day?
The court voted 5-4 to block Trump from firing Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook.
But in a separate case, it upheld Trump's expanded power to dismiss federal agency officials — in a single day, the court told the president both "no" and "yes."
This means → the Supreme Court is not reflexively opposing Trump. It is drawing lines case by case: constitutionally protected rights are off limits; adjustments within executive authority are negotiable.
What does this mean for Trump?
In February, the court already struck down Trump's sweeping tariff measures. This is the second rejection of a core policy in a matter of months.
Trump had publicly predicted he would lose the birthright case and has repeatedly criticized the court.
In plain terms = the relationship between the president and the Supreme Court is deteriorating — even though he nominated a third of its members, the court keeps braking his agenda.
Content is for reference only, not financial advice.