U.S. Warns Allies: Joining China's AI Framework Will Mean Exclusion from U.S.-Led Coalition
Nashnova编辑部
The US State Department is preparing to warn 35 nations that joining China's AI cooperation framework will cost them membership in the US-led Pax Silica alliance — turning AI collaboration into a geopolitical loyalty test.
What exactly is Washington demanding?
The State Department is drafting a letter to 35 signatories of the "AI Opportunities Statement," according to Reuters. The core demand: pick a side between the US and Chinese AI frameworks.
The draft is blunt: "Joining everything is being nothing." This means → Washington will not accept hedging — it defines AI cooperation as an exclusive commitment, not an open menu.
Pax Silica — the AI supply-chain alliance the US launched last year — already has roughly 20 members, including Japan, Australia, and South Korea, spanning AI models, semiconductors, and critical minerals.
Why force the choice now?
The letter does not name China directly but states that Pax Silica "cannot coexist with duplicative initiatives whose expectations conflict with ours."
In plain terms = Washington believes some countries are collecting US tech access with one hand and Chinese resource deals with the other — and that this double-dipping is eroding the alliance's binding power.
This reflects a broader redefinition: AI infrastructure cooperation is no longer a technical matter — it is a geopolitical allegiance test.
Who faces pressure first?
Kazakhstan is the clearest case: it is a major potential source of critical minerals, has joined Pax Silica, and has also joined China's AI alliance.
This means → it will be the first country squeezed into a binary choice — and it is not the only one in that position.
The draft letter has not been formally sent, but its language is clear enough: governments' final decisions will determine whether the two AI systems can continue to coexist.
How has China responded?
China's embassy in Washington said Beijing opposes the politicization of trade and technology issues.
The embassy stated that "such actions will only hinder global AI progress and benefit no one."
In plain terms = Beijing's position is that AI cooperation should remain open and not be tied to bloc alignment — but that is precisely what Washington is doing.
Content is for reference only, not financial advice.