Nomura Dissects China's 10 Trillion Yuan Debt Swap: Half Replaces Bank Loans, Credit Demand Remains Weak
Nashnova编辑部
China's RMB 10 trillion local-government debt-swap program has issued about RMB 7.47 trillion so far; Nomura estimates half went to replacing bank loans — yet even after stripping out the statistical distortion, loan growth has still fallen more than 2 percentage points, pointing to private-sector borrowing appetite as the real problem.
Where did the RMB 7.47 trillion go?
As of end-June 2026, the program has issued roughly RMB 7.47 trillion — 75% drawn from the RMB 6 trillion quota and 25% from the RMB 4 trillion new special-bond allocation.
Nomura's breakdown: about 50% (RMB 3.7 trillion) replaced bank loans, roughly 13% repaid outstanding LGFV bonds, and the remaining 37% went to shadow-credit obligations and overdue government payables to businesses.
This means → bank loans were the single largest target — local governments swapped what they owed banks into lower-rate bonds, effectively shrinking bank balance sheets.
How much did the swap depress headline loan growth?
Moving loans off bank books pushed headline loan growth below the underlying rate. The gap peaked at 1.1 percentage points in Q3 2025 (headline 6.6% vs adjusted 7.7%).
By Q1 2026 the gap had narrowed to roughly 0.5 pp — the statistical distortion is fading.
Yet quarterly swap volumes have barely slowed: Q2 2026 still saw about RMB 628 billion swapped, just below the RMB 715 billion peak. In plain terms = the gap shrank not because swaps slowed, but because the loan base kept growing, diluting the same-sized swap.
Why is the LGFV bond swap so hard to track?
Maturing LGFV bonds and swap-funded repayments look identical in the data, making direct observation impossible. Nomura uses two proxies.
Proxy one: early-redemption records totaling roughly RMB 377 billion, or 6.2% of all repayments in the period — Nomura views this as a floor. Proxy two: the net financing gap of about RMB 941 billion (RMB 5.1 trillion issued vs RMB 6.1 trillion repaid), representing 13% of deployed swap funds.
This means → the true scale of LGFV bond replacement is buried inside "repayment" data; what the market can directly observe is only the tip of the iceberg.
Clearing overdue payables sounds positive — what's the catch?
The remaining roughly RMB 2.8 trillion went to shadow-credit debts and clearing government payables owed to businesses.
There is a counterintuitive cost: swapping a bank loan into a bond merely lowers the interest rate — the obligation stays. But paying off an overdue payable turns a zero-interest, no-maturity liability into a coupon-bearing bond with a fixed term — local governments' financing costs actually rise.
Worse, new arrears are accumulating faster than old ones are cleared. In H1 2026, industrial receivables hit RMB 28.6 trillion, up 7.2% y/y, and the average collection period stretched from 67.9 days to 71.7 days. In plain terms = governments are settling old bills with one hand while running up new ones with the other — and the hole is widening.
Strip away the swap "filter" — what does credit really look like?
Nomura's central finding: even on an adjusted basis, loan growth has dropped more than 2 percentage points since the swap launched — credit weakness cannot be blamed on statistical noise.
Outstanding aggregate social financing (TSF) growth fell from 8.9% in June 2025 to 7.4% in June 2026, a record low. Excluding government bonds, new TSF in H1 2026 was still RMB 799 billion lower year-on-year.
This reflects a private sector that simply does not want to borrow — the government is issuing bonds, but corporates and households are not following.
What are the corporate and household signals saying?
Corporates: medium- and long-term loans fell from RMB 7.17 trillion to RMB 5.55 trillion y/y, while bill financing swung from negative RMB 46 billion to positive RMB 814 billion. This means → banks are padding quotas with bills rather than funding real capex — the apparent resilience in total corporate lending is misleading.
Households: in H1 2026, household loans shrank by RMB 367 billion, versus growth of RMB 1.17 trillion a year earlier — the first contraction on record. Mortgage demand has all but vanished; short-term loans fell RMB 588 billion.
Nomura stresses that households are entirely unaffected by the debt swap. This contraction points squarely to balance-sheet repair. In plain terms = as long as income expectations stay weak and property prices keep falling, households will keep paying down debt rather than taking on new loans — and consumption will stay subdued.
市场有风险，内容仅供研究参考，不构成投资建议。