People's Daily Refutes U.S. AI Distillation Accusations, Warns of Countermeasures
nashnova research
People's Daily formally rejected U.S. claims that Chinese AI firms are mass-distilling American frontier models, calling them baseless — and warned Beijing will retaliate if Washington uses the accusations to suppress Chinese companies, just weeks before a Xi–Trump summit where AI is set to top the agenda.
What is the "distillation" accusation actually about?
The core U.S. claim: Chinese AI firms have been mass-distilling American frontier models — distillation means using a large model's outputs to train a smaller one, so the smaller model absorbs the larger model's capabilities.
This means → Washington believes Chinese companies are taking a shortcut without authorization, using American model outputs to fast-track their own AI.
People's Daily's response was blunt: the claim "lacks factual and legal basis" and amounts to politicizing normal technology and business practices.
How tough is Beijing's stance?
People's Daily is the Chinese Communist Party's official newspaper; its commentary is not opinion journalism — it is a formal statement of government position.
The article explicitly warned: if the U.S. uses the distillation accusations to suppress Chinese AI firms, Beijing will take "countermeasures."
Yet it also left room — calling on both sides to "manage risks through dialogue and communication" and work toward shared goals.
In plain terms = one hand shows a fist, the other extends an olive branch — a classic tough-then-soften diplomatic signal.
Why now?
The key date: President Xi Jinping and President Trump are expected to meet on September 24, with AI likely a major agenda item.
This means → People's Daily's timing is deliberate — it draws a red line in advance while building leverage ahead of the summit.
This reflects a broader shift: AI is no longer just a tech race — it is rapidly becoming a core flashpoint in U.S.–China relations, alongside chips and tariffs.
市场有风险，内容仅供研究参考，不构成投资建议。