Samsung and SK Hynix Reject KEPCO's Prepaid Electricity Fee Proposal
nashnova research
Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix have rejected a ₩25 trillion ($18 billion) prepaid-electricity proposal from Korea Electric Power Corp. — the chipmakers balked at locking up five years of power bills when the semiconductor cycle itself may not last that long.
What was Kepco asking for?
Korea Electric Power Corp. (Kepco) proposed that Samsung and SK Hynix prepay roughly five years of electricity bills — about ₩25 trillion ($18 billion) — to fund grid construction for new technology parks.
In plain terms = the utility lacked the capital to build infrastructure, so it asked its two biggest customers to front the cash — effectively turning them into lenders.
In return, Kepco would pay interest on the outstanding prepaid balance, with collection completed within approximately one year.
Why did the chipmakers say no?
A Kepco spokesperson confirmed: "Both companies ultimately rejected Kepco's proposal."
The core concern is straightforward — whether the semiconductor up-cycle can last five years is uncertain, and committing $18 billion upfront under that uncertainty is too risky.
This means → the chipmakers refused to bankroll utility infrastructure with their own cash flow, especially when a cyclical downturn cannot be ruled out.
What does this reveal about a bigger problem?
Kepco floated this unconventional plan because utilities across Asia face a common funding squeeze — they cannot keep pace with the surging power demand from semiconductor and AI expansion.
This reflects a structural tension: the faster the chip and AI industries grow, the wider the grid-investment gap becomes, yet utilities' own balance sheets are often too stretched to close it alone.
With the plan dead, how Kepco funds the necessary grid buildout becomes the next open question — falling back on bond issuance would only deepen its existing debt burden.
市场有风险，内容仅供研究参考，不构成投资建议。