SpaceX Options See Nearly 1 Million Contracts Traded on First Day as Valuation and AI Hype Spark Market Debate
nashnova research
SpaceX options traded 994,000 call contracts on their first day, making SPCX the fifth-most-active options name in the U.S. — yet option pricing implies comparable odds of a 50% rally and a 50% crash, with the lock-up expiry on August 20 looming as the first real test.
How wild was day one?
Call options on SPCX traded 994,000 contracts, ranking alongside SPY, Nvidia, QQQ, and Tesla as the fifth-most-active U.S. options name — and weekly options had not yet launched.
SPCX swung within a 15% range intraday, closing up roughly 5%.
This means → market interest in pricing SpaceX dwarfed a typical IPO; bulls and bears both showed up in force.
Who was buying — and who was hedging?
Per Susquehanna's post-session review, early flow was speculative call buying: 1,500 July $300 calls at $14 and 6,500 July $325 calls at $7.
Later, large block trades shifted to hedging: a 27,000-contract September 205/225 collar — a collar buys a put and sells a call, locking in a defined range — and a 7,700-contract September 200/220 collar. Both expire just past the first major lock-up release on August 20, 2026, roughly 70 days post-IPO.
In plain terms = retail punted on upside in the morning; big money started buying insurance in the afternoon — and that insurance expires right when insiders can sell.
How extreme is the tail-risk pricing?
Susquehanna noted September options imply roughly a 15% probability SPCX gains another 50% by expiry and roughly a 13% probability it drops 50%.
This means → both tails are expensive — "buying tail risk costs too much; selling tail risk is too dangerous."
In plain terms = the market sees SpaceX as capable of doubling or halving, but betting on either outcome is priced to be a losing trade.
Low float plus passive flows — how did the price get here?
SpaceX's tradable float sits at roughly $8 billion against a market cap of about $2 trillion — a severe supply-demand imbalance.
Macro writer Jack Bowman said he is "completely baffled" by the near-vertical move and questioned whether index-inclusion passive buying will be as significant as the market assumes.
The 2× leveraged SpaceX ETF crossed $3 billion in cumulative two-day volume; SPCH alone traded $1.3 billion on its second day, reportedly an all-time record for an ETF's second session.
This reflects a thin-float dynamic: when tradable shares are scarce, modest capital can push prices to extremes — and leveraged ETFs amplify the effect further.
What does the AI boom have to do with SpaceX's valuation?
Podcast guest Julia Ostian noted that recent U.S. equity gains have been driven almost entirely by AI infrastructure companies, while firms actually deploying AI have yet to show the expected productivity gains.
She added that AI-generated code remains hard to maintain and commercialize in production, meaning broad economic payoffs may take longer than current valuations imply.
This means → SpaceX is being folded into the "AI infrastructure" narrative — orbital computing, Starlink data transit — but the profit path for those businesses is equally unproven. The valuation rests on story, not earnings.
What happens after the lock-up expires?
Tech analyst Kenio Fontes said SpaceX's long-term addressable markets — orbital computing, lunar manufacturing, asteroid mining — are genuinely hard to size, but the increase in share supply after lock-up will pressure the stock.
SpotGamma's model shows dealers currently hold net positive gamma — net positive gamma means dealer hedging automatically dampens price swings — concentrated around the July $195 strike. Short-term support exists, but upside squeeze room is limited.
In plain terms = August 20, 2026 is the first hard gate: the day insiders can sell, the market will learn for the first time whether anyone is willing to take the other side at these prices.
市场有风险，内容仅供研究参考，不构成投资建议。