U.S. Government Urges Apple to Stop Purchasing Chinese Memory Chips
Nashnova编辑部
Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick told Apple directly to stop sourcing memory chips from China, even as Apple tests products from CXMT and YMTC to cope with an AI-driven memory shortage — the standoff will define how far U.S. supply-chain policy actually reaches.
What exactly did the government say?
After touring Apple's Houston factory, Commerce Secretary Lutnick stated: "The Trump administration does not support this — there must be other solutions rather than having premier American companies use Chinese memory chips."
He confirmed he delivered the message "directly" to Apple.
This means → This is not a general policy signal. It is public pressure aimed at a specific company over a specific purchase decision.
Why is Apple testing Chinese chips in the first place?
The Wall Street Journal reported Apple is testing memory chips from CXMT and YMTC — two Chinese manufacturers — for possible use in Apple devices sold in China.
The trigger: AI data centers are consuming so much memory that chips are in short supply and prices have surged, squeezing consumer-electronics makers on cost.
Apple COO Sabih Khan did not confirm the tests directly but said, "We have to look at all options," given the severity of the shortage. He noted Apple does little customization on memory chips.
In plain terms = Apple's memory needs are close to off-the-shelf. Buying Chinese commodity chips is technically feasible.
Do current rules even allow Apple to do this?
U.S. regulations require a license before sharing product specifications with CXMT or YMTC — a step needed only if Apple asks the Chinese firms to customize chips.
Apple can freely buy off-the-shelf products from both companies and negotiate pricing — no license required.
This means → If Apple sticks to standard parts and skips customization, the purchase is currently legal. The government's pressure campaign is political, not regulatory.
What role does Micron play in this fight?
Micron Technology, the Idaho-based memory giant, has lobbied the Trump administration to block Apple's Chinese chip purchases, arguing the move would undermine domestic capacity and contradict the White House's reshoring goals.
Micron's massive U.S. investment plans give it leverage in conversations with the administration and Congress.
Senators from New York, Indiana, and Idaho sent a joint letter in late July to Apple CEO Tim Cook, urging Apple not to work with Chinese chipmakers.
This reflects a dynamic bigger than government-versus-Apple: it is a lobbying clash between two major U.S. corporations — and the Trump administration is caught in between.
What comes next?
A White House spokesperson said: "Semiconductor reshoring is a top priority for President Trump," and related policies have attracted hundreds of billions in investment.
Whether Apple bows to political pressure and drops the Chinese option, or insists on supply diversification to manage the shortage, remains unresolved.
This means → This case will become a key test of how far U.S. tech supply-chain policy actually extends in practice — the tension between policy rhetoric and corporate reality is converging right here.
Content is for reference only, not financial advice.