Reuters: Bessent May Also Serve as U.S. AI Czar, Details of U.S.-China AI Negotiations Revealed
nashnova research
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent is the leading candidate for Trump's newly created AI czar role, having already negotiated AI safety protocols with China this week — this means control of U.S. AI policy may shift from the tech sphere to the Treasury.
What is the "AI czar" role, and why now?
Trump announced last Saturday that he would appoint an AI adviser and build an "AI force," but gave no details.
This means → The White House sees existing agencies as insufficient to coordinate AI policy and wants a single point of authority.
In plain terms = In U.S. politics, a "czar" is not an emperor — it is a lead coordinator for a major issue, like the "energy czar" or "drug czar."
Why Bessent? How does a Treasury Secretary end up running AI?
Reuters, citing people familiar with the matter, identified Bessent as the frontrunner; Semafor first reported the news, and Reuters independently confirmed.
This week he met China's Vice Premier He Lifeng on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly and personally proposed two AI initiatives (details below).
This reflects that Bessent was not randomly floated — he is already actively managing the U.S.–China AI agenda, and the appointment would simply formalize what is already happening.
What exactly did the U.S. and China discuss on AI?
Bessent proposed two specific initiatives: a U.S.–China AI safety notification mechanism and a new U.S.–China AI dialogue framework.
The talks focused on national-security concerns — not commercial cooperation, but preventing AI-driven security risks.
In plain terms = Think of it as the "hotline" logic from military diplomacy: make sure both sides do not miscalculate on AI first, then discuss everything else.
Can one person really hold this many roles at once?
Precedent exists: Interior Secretary Doug Burgum already doubles as the "energy czar."
Bessent himself is already juggling multiple hats — Treasury Secretary, acting IRS commissioner, a stint overseeing the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, and leading Iran sanctions.
This means → There is no institutional barrier. The real question is bandwidth: can one person effectively manage fiscal policy, taxation, and AI simultaneously?
Who else is on the shortlist?
White House science and technology policy chief Michael Kratsios and OPM Director Scott Kupor remain under consideration.
A White House spokesperson called any unreleased personnel reporting "unfounded speculation."
This reflects that the final pick is not locked in — but the candidates' divergent backgrounds will determine whether U.S. AI policy tilts toward a fiscal-industrial logic or a tech-policy logic.
市场有风险，内容仅供研究参考，不构成投资建议。